So I wrote an article on DC's reboot of Starfire. I think the entire thing is a good read, providing context and making fun of Harley Quinn's new costume, but if you're in a rush, here's the moneyshot.
The sexual fantasy of Starfire, the idea that a beautiful woman can indulge in casual sex, in polygamous sex, in lesbian sex, isn’t enough. After all, that fantasy still requires some sort of intrigue on your part. She has to find something interesting in you. You have to have some tiny vestige of a personality, some miniscule potential to please her.
Scott Lobdell gives his audience, his industry, possibly his entire gender the finger and says "Oh no, you motherfuckers. That's not your fantasy. Your fantasy is a woman that will literally have sex with you just for existing. No woman with any standards, no matter how low, no matter how forgiving, could possibly be attracted to you, so here's your new sex object—a brain-damaged goldfish with a rack. And you're such a scared little boy, so afraid of commitment in even your own pathetic fantasies, that you'll run away from a 'clinger' even if she's as gorgeous, charming, and supportive as the woman Starfire used to be. You can't bear even that slight chance that she'll make you move out of your parents' basement, get a real job, and make something of yourself. So I'll cater to that too! Not only doesn't she want a relationship, she won't even remember you! That's what you want in the end, isn't it? A vagina-shaped goldfish! Look upon your lust, ye nerdy, and despair."
The sexual fantasy of Starfire, the idea that a beautiful woman can indulge in casual sex, in polygamous sex, in lesbian sex, isn’t enough. After all, that fantasy still requires some sort of intrigue on your part. She has to find something interesting in you. You have to have some tiny vestige of a personality, some miniscule potential to please her.
Scott Lobdell gives his audience, his industry, possibly his entire gender the finger and says "Oh no, you motherfuckers. That's not your fantasy. Your fantasy is a woman that will literally have sex with you just for existing. No woman with any standards, no matter how low, no matter how forgiving, could possibly be attracted to you, so here's your new sex object—a brain-damaged goldfish with a rack. And you're such a scared little boy, so afraid of commitment in even your own pathetic fantasies, that you'll run away from a 'clinger' even if she's as gorgeous, charming, and supportive as the woman Starfire used to be. You can't bear even that slight chance that she'll make you move out of your parents' basement, get a real job, and make something of yourself. So I'll cater to that too! Not only doesn't she want a relationship, she won't even remember you! That's what you want in the end, isn't it? A vagina-shaped goldfish! Look upon your lust, ye nerdy, and despair."
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 02:32 pm (UTC)Honestly, given that I asked how people would react if the genders were swapped (i.e., say, Hal Jordan being unable to tell humans apart because of something with the ring, and banging both Huntress and Lady Blackhawk), and they tried to claim that they wouldn't be screaming about it being horribly misogynistic and such... I don't really care any more. I've pointed out the hypocrisy, I'm not gonna keep fighting the battle.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 01:24 am (UTC)Really, that's about the only good thing I can say.
What I find incredible is that there are people defending this. No, it's not that she's "eye candy", it's that she's basically an original character someone made up on deviantART because of their fetish, except they have to put a good portion of their commissions of her on their personal website because dA doesn't allow porn.
I wish I was making that kind of thing up.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 02:31 am (UTC)Seriously though, it would be nice if the real Scott Lobdell had half the awareness of your Satire!Lobdell did. The mag would still be tripe, but it would be tripe with a thesis.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 03:48 am (UTC)No, people. It's showing her as a walking Penthouse Forum letter, a porn movie character from a classic title like "Young, Dumb, and Full of Cum 2."
And given that I'm now hearing rumblings that Lobdell never wanted to use Starfire, and she was forced on him by editorial, so this gutting of her character is his form of revenge...
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 12:48 pm (UTC)Okay, I seem to be on Bizarro world. Can someone help me get back to regular Earth?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 02:35 pm (UTC)(So what's the over/under on someone finding this and getting me banned for things I didn't even say on the comm?)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 11:45 pm (UTC)