Some thoughts on genre
Jul. 25th, 2010 10:12 amEvery so often, someone complains that comic books are dominated by superheroes instead of, say, a comic book about cops or doctors. Because God knows there aren't enough stories about cops or doctors out there. What Garth Ennis they fail to realize is that the medium is uniquely suited to comics. The bright, distinctive costumes easily set the characters apart and the pictures are able to depict any action the creator wishes without straining a budget. By contrast, look at TV shows that try to depict the same thing. Both Heroes and Smallville didn't take long to start sucking out loud.
And while we're all tired of cops, doctors, and lawyers, procedurals and sitcoms are uniquely suited to the medium of television. Meanwhile, it occurs to me that horror is uniquely unsuited to TV, since the viewer knows that the entire cast is usually going to show up for the next episode alive and well, and most horror relies on the worry that the cast will die. Sure, Buffy and Supernatural (maybe even Doctor Who) are exceptions, but they're more adventure shows anyway. The question isn't "will our guys survive?" as "will our guys triumph?"
So, what genre is uniquely suited to movies?
And while we're all tired of cops, doctors, and lawyers, procedurals and sitcoms are uniquely suited to the medium of television. Meanwhile, it occurs to me that horror is uniquely unsuited to TV, since the viewer knows that the entire cast is usually going to show up for the next episode alive and well, and most horror relies on the worry that the cast will die. Sure, Buffy and Supernatural (maybe even Doctor Who) are exceptions, but they're more adventure shows anyway. The question isn't "will our guys survive?" as "will our guys triumph?"
So, what genre is uniquely suited to movies?