Jamie Bell is maybe Spider-Man
Jun. 7th, 2010 12:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Huh. That's probably the best news that could come out of the Spider-Man camp. The guy somehow managed to come out of the clusterfuck that was Jumper with flying colors, easily bitch-slapping the jive-ass Chosen One off the screen (hmm, douchey man-prat or lovably amoral rebel, who should be the hero? Wait, Jamie Bell wants to blow up Rachel Bilson and end a timeless Hayden Christiansen romance, clearly he's... in... the... wrong). Seriously, if the guy just acted like he did in Jumper when in costume... cocky, charismatic, quick with a quip... they're halfway home.
ETA: Then again, he is white. How dare you racist filmmakers not contort a classic character to accommodate a virtual unknown with little acting experience! You're the reason Chappelle's Show was canceled!
ETA: Then again, he is white. How dare you racist filmmakers not contort a classic character to accommodate a virtual unknown with little acting experience! You're the reason Chappelle's Show was canceled!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 01:45 am (UTC)In the second case, the script would be rewritten with a black actor in mind, in which case the complaint would be that instead of being an adaptation of Spider-Man, it's an entirely new character dealing with the black experience (as told by a white director and white screenwriter).
Either way, you wouldn't so much end up with bold progress as you would with very flamboyant stunt casting.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 02:58 am (UTC)Hollywood, your determination to do the Right Thing in the Worng Way is about to screw over everyone again, isn't it?
no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 03:40 am (UTC)There just aren't many roles like that that were originally written as characters of color, simply because people of color don't typically get to be heroes in our national myths. If you insist that it's only worthwhile to cast actors of color in roles originally written as people of color, for comic book movies we're stuck waiting until someone figures out how to make a John Stewart movie interesting, or a Luke Cage movie not the death of a scriptwriter's career. And neither of those roles are cultural touchstones the way Spider-man is, or Superman, or Batman, or, hell, the Doctor, which was the last time I saw this debate come up. Sure, Samuel L Jackson is a badass Nick Fury, but not a whole lot of people who weren't comic book fans knew who Nick Fury was before Sam schooled us.
I don't buy that most situations are damned if you do, damned if you don't, and if it ever so happens that that is the case, you might as well do, if it's going to suck for you either way. At least you'll get in a few "Ha ha, showed you fuckers" on your way down.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 04:49 am (UTC)And the cultural touchstone argument is a bit disingenuous. Nobody knew who Iron Man was before his movie came out. If a movie about Jaime Reyes or Static was given the same care and talent as Iron Man's movie, then they would become cultural touchstones, which would be a lot better in the long-run than just having Spider-Man portrayed as a black man for one outing.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 02:54 am (UTC)You forgot to mention the part where he threw a bus at Samuel L Jackson.
A bus.
At Samuel.
L.
Jackson.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 03:01 am (UTC)Which reminds me, I have to read the book sometime.