Dollhouse episodes 1 & 2
Feb. 24th, 2009 09:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I’m going to take off the feminism hat for this one, for two reasons. One, feminism is subjective. And it’s very hard to separate personal squick from capital-F feminism. It’s even harder to separate art from artist. There are as many people who think that Joss Whedon can do no wrong as there are those who think he’s not nearly as feminist as he claims. So reviewing the show on its own merits, especially from a feminist standpoint… maybe I’ll tackle it in another post, but I think the major perspectives have already been tagged by
prozacpark and
resolute and man, I don’t even have an opinion.
And second, it’s hard to tell from two episodes where they’re going with it. They’ve just barely established the premise. So I, personally, am not ready to fault Joss or praise him just yet.
But what really surprises me about both episodes is how vanilla they are. I feel like you could take the premise to Michael Bay or any semi-talented hack and they’d give you much the same product. After hearing the premise, I thought it’d be almost an anthology series, with each week having a new genre, but with an overarcing story and metaphor. Joss does hostage drama! Joss does slasher movie! But all the quirky characters and quotable dialogue and subversions of cliché are MIA.
Even when he has his thumb jammed down on the tragedy button, Joss’s works are at least fun to read. But here we’ve gone from stuff like Spike MSTing one of Angel’s rescues to an FBI agent being told to back down, then it cuts to a boxing match when he gets up from the mat and wins. Whose high school writing assignment did that metaphor come from?
I think the real problem is that none of the characters have that distinctive Whedon personality. Echo’s a blank slate, Adelle’s British, Claire’s hideously scarred (which must be fun for the Angel fans in the audience), Boyd and Ballard are stiffs, and Topher’s creepy, but not in a way that’s fun to watch. The crew of the NX-01 Enterprise were better company.
Coming around to the feminism thing… Supernatural is misogynistic, but it’s entertaining. And while Eliza Dushku is nearly as pretty as Jensen Ackles, her show, sexist or feminist, so far isn’t worth the time it takes to watch it.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And second, it’s hard to tell from two episodes where they’re going with it. They’ve just barely established the premise. So I, personally, am not ready to fault Joss or praise him just yet.
But what really surprises me about both episodes is how vanilla they are. I feel like you could take the premise to Michael Bay or any semi-talented hack and they’d give you much the same product. After hearing the premise, I thought it’d be almost an anthology series, with each week having a new genre, but with an overarcing story and metaphor. Joss does hostage drama! Joss does slasher movie! But all the quirky characters and quotable dialogue and subversions of cliché are MIA.
Even when he has his thumb jammed down on the tragedy button, Joss’s works are at least fun to read. But here we’ve gone from stuff like Spike MSTing one of Angel’s rescues to an FBI agent being told to back down, then it cuts to a boxing match when he gets up from the mat and wins. Whose high school writing assignment did that metaphor come from?
I think the real problem is that none of the characters have that distinctive Whedon personality. Echo’s a blank slate, Adelle’s British, Claire’s hideously scarred (which must be fun for the Angel fans in the audience), Boyd and Ballard are stiffs, and Topher’s creepy, but not in a way that’s fun to watch. The crew of the NX-01 Enterprise were better company.
Coming around to the feminism thing… Supernatural is misogynistic, but it’s entertaining. And while Eliza Dushku is nearly as pretty as Jensen Ackles, her show, sexist or feminist, so far isn’t worth the time it takes to watch it.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:48 am (UTC)But yeah, that boxing thing was weeeeak.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:51 am (UTC)The controversy, however, is much more entertaining and stimulating for the brain.
Of course, the controversy is now going to make me want and watch MOAR of the show...yes...because that's just how life works.
Anyways, I'm split down the middle with this issue. I think both users pose great arguments, but, like you said, it's too early to tell.
The Dollhouse'rs looking all "hot and bothered" are disturbing because a lot of viewers find them hot (WHEN THEY ARE VICTIMS).
Meanwhile, Joss Whedon might be trying to make a point that the victims gain power through tough experiences (as stated by resolute).
It's almost a win-win situation for the viewers. Viewer A gets turned on by hot!victims while Viewer B awes at Echo finding her true self.
Or Viewer C is completely turned off and finds it unethical that the so-called-feminist Joss Whedon is pleasing both audiences.
Tough call...if what I just actually makes any sense.
And basically, that's the problem and that's why everyone is arguing.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 04:00 am (UTC)Yeah, my issues with the show are more network related because, obviously, the show FOX wants (as judged by the 'pop-up's' with a half-naked Dushku gazing seductively into the camera - I mean, really, would they sell 24 and Jack Bauer like that?) and the story Joss wants to tell are, apparently, mutually exclusive. So, Joss has been forced to pull his punches with a premise that shouldn't be held back. I understand he did this as a favor to Dushku, who's production company is producing it, but, honestly, wish he'd said 'no' and tried to find another network looking for something a bit more than 'Hot Girls With Guns'.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 04:05 am (UTC)Well, I do recall an advert showing the male leads of Prison Break giving the camera Blue Steel looks with the caption "So Wanted," but that doesn't hold a candle to the commercial book-ends for the series premiere with Summer Glau and Eliza Dushku doing commentary so openly patronizing that I'm surprised the theme wasn't them having a sleepover. "Hey TV fans, hope you liked that episode of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Now I'm going to give Eliza a hot oil massage, while you stay tuned for Dollhouse. So Memorable, So Fox!"
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 04:24 am (UTC)I think I remember those PB ads. And I think those ads were more about selling machismo and any homo-eroticism was probably coincidental. Still, I want Jack Bauer lying half-naked on a bear-skin rub gazing seductively into the camera or, even better, House! C'mon FOX, be the equal opportunity exploitation network we all know you wanna be!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 04:29 am (UTC)"It's not lupus."
"Damnit."
HAWT.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 01:17 am (UTC)