![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. All female protagonists of any story (but most especially urban fantasy) must have body issues. In the olden days, the defining characteristic of women was shoes. However, men eventually tumbled to that, and now if you asked Clint Eastwood to write a female character, he'd write that she likes shopping for shoes. Thus, the new way for female characters to be relatable and sympathetic is for them to complain that their breasts aren't large enough.
2. The more femslashable a character is, the more odious her male love interest will be.
3. Any fake folklore must include a sequence where two people change into different forms to conflict with each other.
4. Nobody puts Baby in the corner.
2. The more femslashable a character is, the more odious her male love interest will be.
3. Any fake folklore must include a sequence where two people change into different forms to conflict with each other.
4. Nobody puts Baby in the corner.
Rule 2
Date: 2009-02-11 10:31 pm (UTC)Though now I think about it, some of my favorite femslash characters have some mighty insipid bastard love interests... She must be the exception that proves the rule.
Re: Rule 2
Date: 2009-02-12 12:48 am (UTC)Re: Rule 2
Date: 2009-02-12 08:10 am (UTC)Re: Rule 2
Date: 2009-02-12 11:02 pm (UTC)Barda does go with everyone (perhaps because she's Ms. Butch Boots), but I really see femslash pairings as alternatives to Scott/Barda rather than it being an alternative to the femslash (like you'd get with, say, Rachel/Ivy as compared to Rachel/WTF!Marshall).
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:54 am (UTC)?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 09:13 am (UTC)