So, Cloverfield.
Let’s start off with the good. This is a movie that has learned its lesson from similar “ground eye view” disaster movies like Signs and War of the Worlds. I know a lot of reviews are harping on the characters being unlikable, but I found them refreshingly human and thankfully not as urbane as these kinds of characters usually are (look at the cast of Smallville, who have a none-too-witty quip for any occasion, to see what I’m talking about). They’re people. Stupid, smart, witty, friendly, bitchy, flirty, heroic, frightened… people. No one has a dark secret, no one has a tearful confession to make, and although there is some requisite melodrama to the love subplot, it’s all very tastefully underplayed. No one kisses in the rain while complete strangers clap, is what I’m getting at.
The monster is great, if a little… generic? You don’t really get to know it well enough to see what makes it special. It doesn’t even get a name. It’s good that it’s mysterious, but unfortunately
Cloverfield takes the
Lost tendency to say “we know the whole story, but we’re not telling you it (but trust us, there’s a whole story)” and extrapolate it to the big screen. You know how frustrating it was when they wouldn’t just come out and say what the Rabbit’s Foot was in M:I3, and thus made it cloyingly transparent that it was a McGuffin? Same thing here.
And much like its predecessors, which also never knew how to really tie up all the action they’d presented (and this has a great action/other stuff ratio), Cloverfield suffers from a weak third act/ending.
( Spoiler. )Something I do have to commend the filmmakers on is just making a proper thrill ride. Basically, they take a very real fear – an attack on New York City – and put it in the “safe” realm of the fantastical – an attack on New York City being perpetrated by a
giant fucking monster! Now, some might call that exploitative, but I think the images of 9/11 have become such a part of our cultural landscape that anyone looking to scare audiences pretty much has to deal with it. Falling buildings and roving dust clouds belong to terror the same way that Yakety Sax belongs to comedy. And besides,
Godzilla dealt with nuclear weapons, so this is a part of the genre from the beginning. And it isn’t anywhere near as ham-fisted as movies like
Land of the Dead are. Some might criticize
Cloverfield for “not saying anything”, but I’d rather stand beside a silent person than one who screams into my ear with a megaphone.
I guess the biggest disappointment is
Cloverfield being a victim of its own success. The monster is… just a monster.
Tremors did that, and the Graboids still had personality (even when they went aboveground). There’s no twist, no totally out-there bit where the monster turns out to be Cthulu or something. It’s just a monster. After all that hype, it’s just a monster. So it’s a great thrill ride, which is rare enough in this day and age, but I wish there were something more. Isn’t there a compromise between Pirates of the Caribbean 3 and Cloverfield, a movie that has a heart to go with its thrills?
Well, it probably won’t be Rambo, coming out next week, but damn if I’m not seeing it anywhere. They did draw first blood, after all, those
Vietnamese Commie small-town America Burmese bastards!