The good idea jeans were not put on.
Jul. 8th, 2011 09:23 pmSo apparently there's talk of Naomie Harris as Moneypenny in the next James Bond movie. Now, Naomie Harris is a fine actress and Moneypenny isn't a bad character, so this is bad for one reason only: They're going to take the entire dynamic of James Bond, the biggest cocksmith in genre fiction, and the one woman he won't have sex with, and it's a white man and a black woman? I mean, c'mon. Even in Britain, there's gotta be unfortunate implications there. If they're the same race, at least you can argue that as big a sex pest as Bond is, he won't go in for an office romance, or that one of them is gay and they're just camping it up. Actually, that last one sounds kind of interesting, but I'll stop before we get to the scene where MI-6 is attacked, so Moneypenny strips down to a tanktop and starts shooting terrorists with a shotgun she keeps in her desk.
Maybe Q could be black instead? That seems like a much more positive PoC character, and if there's one thing Doctor Who has taught me, it's that there's got to be a cool black guy just waiting to say "Grow up, 007!" (Richard Ayoade? Dude. Dude.)

ETA: Speaking of Doctor Who, Catherine Tate as Moneypenny. I'd be able to have head-canon that after being mind-wiped, Donna Noble changed her name and started temping for MI-6, because Captain Jack got her security clearance for the really high pay-grade stuff. Now she saves the world with office work.
Maybe Q could be black instead? That seems like a much more positive PoC character, and if there's one thing Doctor Who has taught me, it's that there's got to be a cool black guy just waiting to say "Grow up, 007!" (Richard Ayoade? Dude. Dude.)

ETA: Speaking of Doctor Who, Catherine Tate as Moneypenny. I'd be able to have head-canon that after being mind-wiped, Donna Noble changed her name and started temping for MI-6, because Captain Jack got her security clearance for the really high pay-grade stuff. Now she saves the world with office work.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 03:00 am (UTC)I'm interested to see what they'll do with Moneypenny (and Q) if they're reintroducing them; the past two movies haven't shown any inclination to include perfunctory single scenes just because that's what the series always does, so I wonder if they're planning to make more use of these staple characters when they bring them back.
Certainly, Harris is a lot more attractive than past Moneypennys (Lois Maxwell and Samantha Bond were hardly unattractive, of course, but next to the rotating Bond girls they were always overshadowed).
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 03:55 am (UTC)2) Are they not rebooting the casting of James Bond himself with the Mendes film (yet again)? Because part of the whole point of the Daniel Craig Bond films, as I understand it, was that they basically pulled a John Byrne Man of Steel on the entire pre-Craig Bond series, so neither Berry nor Michelle Yeoh are even in modern Bond continuity anymore.
3) Regardless of any previous liaisons, part of the entire point of recasting all your fucking characters from the ground up is to attract new audiences who neither know nor care about the previous movies, which makes it pretty goddamned pointless to say, "Oh, yeah, Bond had sex with exactly ONE black woman, back when Moneypenny was still white," because they're not SUPPOSED to have to be familiar with those OLD movies, so what you're left with in the NOW is exactly as
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 04:01 am (UTC)Yes, that's right, a Clive Cussler book did a Bond cliche better than the Bond films ever did.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 04:18 am (UTC)and repeatedly turning down the only black woman in his life.
Bond and Moneypenny jokingly flirt, typically, neither of them is ever particularly serious about it. She's not actually waiting around M's office listening to "On My Own" on repeat and awaiting the day when Bond finally notices her.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 04:33 am (UTC)And yet, the film studio itself took great pains to specify that the Craig films were specifically divorced from any and all previous Bond continuity. Hell, even Brosnan's Bond visited the grave of Lazenby Bond's dead wife.
my point was that James Bond, the cinema icon, has had non-white love interests
Except that the vast majority of them have been white women, and given how movie studios tend to cast their roles, let's not kid ourselves; the vast majority of them will continue to be white women, which, once again, leaves us with a story of a white guy working his way through a stream of white girls, while for some reason NOT accepting the advances of the black woman who's part of his recurring cast.
It strikes me as an incredibly silly concern.
James Bond is hardly the source to go to for feminist portrayals of women, I'll agree, and I doubt there was any malice whatsoever intended in this casting (indeed, they probably had very noble, progressive intentions here), but from the standpoint of being yet another story about a white man who looks directly past an attractive black woman for no good reason to go chasing after a whole bunch of white women (because Bond has always led with his dick), it IS adding to an unfortunate overall pattern of how black women are portrayed in larger pop culture.
Am I saying we should treat this as some great affront worthy of protest? No. I'm simply pointing out, as
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 04:37 am (UTC)I mean, did I rape a nun in a past life? Because that's all I can think, as far as how I could possibly deserve this.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 04:41 am (UTC)As I said, very little continuity; each film can reference or not reference past stuff, but it almost never matters.
while for some reason NOT accepting the advances of the black woman who's part of his recurring cast.
Moneypenny's "advances" were never serious, so far as I recall; most of the time it's just her and Bond bantering none-too-seriously while he's waiting to see M.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-10 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-10 12:52 pm (UTC)