seriousfic (
seriousfic) wrote2010-06-15 05:05 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
No, it's "the perfect woman enters an imperfect world to change it for the better."
Okay, so Nicolas Winding Refn, the director of Bronson, wants to make a Wonder Woman movie. Okay, any movie could benefit from having an auteur instead of hack, and certainly any story could use someone with a clear creative vision instead of "How much side-boob can I show in a PG-13 movie?" But, uh...
...the real origin of Wonder Woman is: What if women were more powerful than men? What would the world be like? That’s a subliminal theme. [...]But she does have her whole world that she comes from, which is fascinating. The whole idea of a woman who is basically more powerful than any man — and who will always be that, and comes from a society of women who are more powerful than men — is an interesting theme that I think can be very contemporary.
Waat?

I'm... not sure if he phrased that the best way. Perhaps I'm hopelessly literal. But A. The Amazons aren't literally powerful. The canon is inconsistent on this, because it's the Wonder Woman canon, and it's inconsistent on literally everything except that Wonder Woman is a woman, but generally Wonder Woman is the only (or one of a very few) Amazon with superpowers. B. There are no men on Paradise Island. C'mon, we've all heard the jokes. It's not a matriarchal society, because there's no men to deny power to. You could argue that there's xenophobia and misandry there, but I don't think it would fly far.
Are we sure Joss Whedon isn't still interested?
...the real origin of Wonder Woman is: What if women were more powerful than men? What would the world be like? That’s a subliminal theme. [...]But she does have her whole world that she comes from, which is fascinating. The whole idea of a woman who is basically more powerful than any man — and who will always be that, and comes from a society of women who are more powerful than men — is an interesting theme that I think can be very contemporary.
Waat?

I'm... not sure if he phrased that the best way. Perhaps I'm hopelessly literal. But A. The Amazons aren't literally powerful. The canon is inconsistent on this, because it's the Wonder Woman canon, and it's inconsistent on literally everything except that Wonder Woman is a woman, but generally Wonder Woman is the only (or one of a very few) Amazon with superpowers. B. There are no men on Paradise Island. C'mon, we've all heard the jokes. It's not a matriarchal society, because there's no men to deny power to. You could argue that there's xenophobia and misandry there, but I don't think it would fly far.
Are we sure Joss Whedon isn't still interested?
no subject
no subject
(I'm not claiming any of these takes is definitive, just what I think of based on the slice of the characters I've been exposed to at a particular time, obviously under different creative teams and storylines and eras and editors and whatnot all these characters can change like crazy)
Anyway, so they're all powerful women living in a patriarchal world, but to me is seems like Wonder Woman has been more specifically about being a powerful woman in a patriarchal world than most. As far as the rest of the residents of Themiscrya go, my guess is that the general cultural perception is that pretty much all of them are at least Buffy/Xena class somewhat superhuman + highly martially trained + probably magic artifacts, certainly tougher than the average guy.